They’ve changed the competition format for this edition, expanding the comp to 40 teams.
10 groups, only first place from each group is guaranteed to advance. 3 best runners up from each side also progress. That means two groups in Sydney’s half of the draw will only have one team advancing.
Why do I feel like Sydney are locked in to finish 2nd but not do enough to progress?
Brisbane Roar have their qualifying match against Kaya-Iloilo (Philippines), it’s their first ever appearance in a Champions League. Would love to see them do a Ceres against Brisbane.
If Brisbane win that, they have to go against Beijing Guoan for a spot in the group stage.
Melbourne City have Shan United (Burma) in their first qualifier. Win that and they are against Cerezo Osaka.
I’d love to have a crack at the other AFC tournament (AFC cup?) just so we can play some different teams for a change. I always like watching the Europa league for all these weird and wonderful teams we get to see. I’d imagine it would be the same story
Seeing the comp expanded has meant guaranteed group stage appearances for a team from Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Vietnam, Philippines and Thailand.
Chances for something more interesting than just a J.League, K League, CSL team as almost every other time.
Haven’t been back to Singapore for ages and have always wanted to do the away trip there, would have been a great excuse for a little holiday. Thanks COVID!
Colour me jaded, but in a hub style groupstage on neutral territory, whats the point of 6 games each?
Also, the seedings seemed strange, shouldnt the top 5 eastern rankings get 1 team each as a seed one? Korea china japan thailand australia, or is that too European in thinking? Sydney instead got relegated to pot 4 with the other qualifiers, even behind teams that never featured in acl before.