What “influence”? Of all the things that have come out of Twitter out of all of this, I find this one the most confusing.
They have 6.11% of the vote. Who else do they have influence over? With a raison d’être incongruent to every other HAL club (essentially UEFA FFP violation), why would they have more influence over other clubs than Barlow, Di Pietro, Lederer, Sage, etc.? They’re clearly not buying out the smaller federations (NT, ACT, NNSW, etc.) who’ve been consistently voting against City on Congress matters, PFA is clearly pushing its own line, I see no reason why they would have any disproportionate sway over FNSW or Qld.
What is this thought-bubble?