It's OK to be White and other dogwhistles - the Australian politics thread

I really hate it but I think we probably have the least worst system. Senators and MPs need to have the ability to leave their parties: most often the individual goes rogue, but sometimes the party goes off the deep end.

The honourable thing to do is probably resign from the party, give them both barrels, then resign the seat.

2 Likes

Yup. Not sure there is any good way to form rules for the scenario.

2 Likes

To bind elected representatives to follow the caucus decisions of the party they were affiliated with at the time of the election, you would have to change our parliamentary system so we are electing a party instead of electing a representative. That’s constitutional.

There’s no bandaid legislation that can actually change that. Even giving parties the right to fill a casual vacancy caused by a retired senator with one of their own required a referendum (1977)

1 Like

If your candidate in a seat looks a little green (pardon the pun) you should be able to loan them out to a rival to gain political experience.

You should also be able to loan in a candidate should you need a bit more experience in the role.

Following the football analogy, the Greens leader should get to bench the senator who has already signed for Labor and deny them a vote, unless they feel it’s a must-win piece of legislation.

There is no means for removing parliamentarians from office, outside of an election, that does not create an unfortunate precedent that could be used by bad faith actors further down the track to overturn the results of an election.

3 Likes

But that’s what we do in the senate? Which is where most of these problems seem to arise. Which is frustrating as anyone elected as a member of a large party would have very few votes for themselves.

Yeah agree this is where it gets unrealistic

Not sure if srs. But there’s something to it I reckon. Perhaps a member can not seek re-election with a party if they were not a member of the party for the last 6 months of the previous term? dunno how you enforce it. And yep, totally open to bad faith actions at that length of time.

We’re not really doing it in the senate though, we’re just lazy and have a mechanism to pretend we are. I’m one of the sadists who goes through and numbers every box.

2 Likes

It’s obviously complicated by the fact that you do need to allow people to leave parties and you are technically selecting a person not a party (even above the line in the senate, I think you’re effectively voting for a preselected order of people, just in the way the party you chose wants it).

The issue is the integrity of the person changing parties. If they know they were practically voted in because of their party and not because of themselves, they should respect that vote unless it is genuinely no longer the party that was in place when the votes were cast.

No easy answers other than “do the right thing dickhead”

Actually the Greens senator has already represent the Greens this season so they shouldn’t be allowed to register for an opposing party, unless an agreement is reached and then they shouldn’t be allowed to take part in votes for specific legislative topics.

1 Like

I think he’s talking about a Bosman ruling


2 Likes

The problem here is one of morality rather than legality. A candidate is sworn in in their name, not that of the party on whose ticket they were elected.

Accordingly, a person sworn in as a senator or member is absolutely free to leave a party on a matter of conscience. And if they are principled they will leave the seat. If they do not, people can form their own view as to how much to trust that person.

My bet is that Dorinda Cox was not going to be preselected top of the Greens ticket next time up and she’s opportunistically seeing if she can land on the Labor ticket. Labor members may prefer someone else, and she may wind up then running as an indie.

I think the chances of her being a senator past the end of her term (30/6/2028) are about the same as Fatima Payman - absolutely fuck all.

5 Likes

Just had a call from the AEC wanting to confirm where I voted - I guess Bradfield is heating up if they are doing spot checks.

Well yes, thus the not sure


Bradfield has been called in favour of Nicolette Boele. The Liberal Party and MSM dirt unit failed their mission.

4 Likes

Final NSW count 28 Labor, 6 independent, 6 lib, 6 Nat.

National Labor 94
Libs 34 (including 16 in qld, a good chunk of which would be notionally Nat’s)
Nats 9
Green 1
Other 12

Satisfying result.

2 Likes

Not sure if this belongs here or in ME pol more; we’ve put travel bans on two of Netanyahu’s most pro-genocide ministers today, along with a coalition of other states.

Here, because it’s an issue here - Michaelia Cash has apparently gone berko

2 Likes

She stays berko

6 Likes

image

2 Likes