It’s an even sillier use of the language than I thought, as it’s now compounding a silly use of language!
I’m going to go stare at a wall …
It’s an even sillier use of the language than I thought, as it’s now compounding a silly use of language!
I’m going to go stare at a wall …
Bring back the W M
A traditional winger is outside footed and stays on the outside to cross with their outside foot.
An inverted winger cuts inside to shoot or pass with their inside foot. This is now the most common way to play a winger.
A fullback who is not inverted usually performs the “traditional” winger role in the modern game.
If the winger performs the “traditional” role, and the fullback instead cuts inside to shoot or pass, we now call them an “inverted” fullback.
In all cases, what’s inverting isn’t the side of the field you play on, but which foot you are expected to participate in an attack with.
Do we start posting inverted dinosaurs now or later?
Don’t see us getting through this one sadly.
And when you apply it to Ninko, a right footed player on the left and Lolley who plays on the right with his left …
I don’t ever recall it being applied to Holosko, a right footed player on the right who cut in a lot but also occasionally hit the byline.
It’s a really, really bad name.
Oh well. What are you gonna do.
Saw someone on twitter recently who said “inverted 8” and was mercilessly mocked.
Wonder how I missed this nuance for over 5 years.
And then wonder why someone would come up with a such a stupid name.
I think Redders did some inverted keeping in the first semi
False Keeper
But it sort of is though isn’t it. Like you said, a traditional winger plays on the side of his dominant foot, if youre expecting him to come inside, then logically speaking, you’re going to swap those players. There’s no point in a right footed player cutting inside from the right as it doesn’t give him an advantageous position to shoot. While in theory, inverted winger has a meaning, in practice, it would generally be a player switching sides to being opposite to his dominant foot.
Generally the position averts the invert unless the coach instructs them to occasionally revert back to the invert however if they’re an extrovert they can take it upon themselves to invert which in itself is inverting the inversion.
I believe the correct term is “unverted winger”?
wouldn’t that be an inverted inverted winger?
Sorry to disrupt the inversion chat, but why do we concede a penalty in this for handling the ball outside the box?
Other than that entirely realistic.
It’s a very archaic rule, but most people don’t know that the Mt White interchange counts as being inside the technical area. It’s an enclave as you would have it.
You haven’t seen some of the calls this season if you think this is unrealistic.
Inverted rules regarding pens
Prefer to set my teams up with prolapsed wingers.