I’d think it would be a bit difficult to implement. What constitutes a striker? Clubs often sign players to cover more than one position, i.e. playing as a traditional striker, but maybe also playing wider in a 4-3-3 for example. What if the club decided that the player was better suited to a deeper midfield role, like a number 10? How does that effect the club’s salary cap? If the club have to play the player in a true striker role, does that mean he might sit on the bench a lot more rather than having an opportunity to play, but in a slightly different role?
The issue isn’t that the clubs don’t have these players in the squad, more that they don’t get a chance to play. A move to 7 man benches would at least give them a chance to be in the match day squad, cap exemptions won’t.
next thing, you’ll be telling us when need to remove corruption from FIFA…
In seriousness though, UEFA and FIFA need a proper stance against this, with proper punishments. The programs running are a step forward, but repeat offenders need to be punished by getting kicked out of competitions. A year or two of not being able to play international games would teach those countries a proper lesson. I’d say the majority of people wouldn’t be overtly racist and they’d find the tide turn against the hooligan/right wing element who come to games to fight rather than appreciate the game.
The first keeper hit the net at the exact moment the ball hit the post, and all the players that stopped are from areas of the pitch that had a similar view, can only assume that from where they were they mistakenly saw the ball hit the back of the net. The players closest or to the bottom of the screen all play on, it’s just cleared away from them quickly and they can’t prevent the counter.
The second keeper had apparently run to half way to celebrate the “goal” with his teams bench. Lol.